English

Español

Français

Русский

Aerospace

Automotive

Base metals

Chemical, pharmaceutical and bio-science

Energy

Glass, cement, ceramic and associated industries

ICT, electrical and electronics

Mechanical Engineering

Mining and DGOJP

Pulp and paper

Rubber

Shipbuilding and shipbreaking

Textile, garment, shoes, leather and textile services

Sectors

Action on textile and garment industry

Clean up shipbreaking

Ratify ILO C176

United for a just future - time to pay up!

Disinvest from Myanmar

Action Plan 2021-2025

Global Framework Agreements

Union building

Women

Youth

White-collar workers

Health & safety

Industry 4.0

Just Transition

Organizing with industriALL

What we do

Affiliates

Statutes

Elected Officials

Executive Committee

Geneva head office

South East Asia

Eastern Europe, Central Asia and the Caucasus

Latin America and the Caribbean

Middle East and North Africa

South Asia

Regional offices

About us

Global worker No1 2022

Global worker No2 2022

Publications

Resources

Press

<img alt="" src="" width="100" height="39" />
The ICEM tracks climate negotiations because of their profound implications for all workers, but especially industrial workers in energy-producing and energy-intensive industries. The Global Union Federation supports a fair, ambitious, and legally-binding climate treaty, but insists that decision-makers consider the social implications. 
 
Existing jobs must be made more sustainable, and new, or &ldquo;green jobs,&rdquo; can be created, but they must not be &ldquo;mcjobs.&rdquo; They must provide decent work. This implies a need for national industrial strategies. Strong social programmes must back specific &ldquo;Just Transition&rdquo; provisions. 
 
Lastly, the world must not forget that fundamental structural changes in our economy are needed as the financial crisis demonstrated that the same kind of short-sighted thinking that has jeopardized the environment, equally has jeopardized economic stability. 
 
After the failure that was COP-15 in Copenhagen in 2009, COP-16 in Canc&uacute;n, Mexico, opened to low expectations. Many felt that the best that could be hoped for was to put the process back on track, build some trust, and aim for real decisions at COP-17 in 2011. 
<img alt="" src="" width="181" height="125" />
ICEM&rsquo;s Brian Kohler speaking at plenary session of Ad-hoc Working Group on Long-term Cooperative Action
At COP-15, before the talks collapsed and the so-called &ldquo;Copenhagen Accord&rdquo; emerged from secret backroom talks, trade unions had succeeded in winning the insertion of a paragraph in the &ldquo;Shared Vision&rdquo; portion of the Long-term Cooperative Action draft, covering a range of issues including adaptation, mitigation, financing, research and development, technology transfer, training and education, and Just Transition. This paragraph came to be known as the &ldquo;Just Transition and Decent Work&rdquo; paragraph. 
 
For reasons unknown, the Chair of the Ad-hoc Working Group on Long-term Cooperative Action (AWG-LCA) removed this paragraph from the document under discussion, and labour was faced with a fight to get it back. 
 
The Just Transition language agreed that &ldquo;addressing climate change requires a paradigm shift towards building a low-emission society that offers substantial opportunities and ensures continued high growth and sustainable development, based on innovative technologies and more sustainable production and consumption and lifestyles, while ensuring a just transition of the workforce that creates decent work and quality jobs.&rdquo; 
 
Related stakeholder language that was also missing recognized the need for civil society to participate in decisions that affect their lives, workplaces, and communities. 
 
Recovering this language became a priority of the trade union delegation to COP-16. ICEM Health, Safety, Sustainability Officer Brian Kohler addressed the opening plenary of the AWG-LCA on behalf of trade unions, and emphasized the need for this language. 
 
Throughout the two weeks of COP-16, coordinated by the International Trade Union Confederation&rsquo;s (ITUC) Anabella Rosemberg, every trade union delegate made efforts to contact members of the negotiating teams to stress the need for this paragraph. Kohler himself spoke to negotiators from Europe, Japan, and the assistant to the Chair of the AWG-LCA, among others. This all-out effort finally paid off: at the last minute, on the last day, it was announced that the text had made it back into the &ldquo;Shared Vision.&rdquo; 
 
The final report of the Subsidiary Body on Scientific and Technical Advice, on Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) eligibility as a Clean Development Mechanism (part of the Kyoto Protocol track), presented two options on CCS for consideration by the Parties. In the end, the Parties adopted the more favourable of the two options. Therefore, CCS will be an eligible project activity under the Kyoto Protocol's Clean Development Mechanism (CDM), provided it complies with fairly stringent risk and safety assessments. This is a positive development for supporters of CCS, including ICEM and many of its affiliates. 
 
As for protecting the earth from disastrous climate change, much remains to be done. Developed countries must be more ambitious in their emissions reduction targets, and although progress was made on the subject of funding, the poorest nations of the world have yet to see a fully adequate finance plan for mitigation and adaptation. 
 
On balance, however, COP-16 did represent a small step forward, and raises hope that at COP-17 next year, a more effective &ldquo;fair, ambitious, and binding&rdquo; climate treaty may be reached. 
 
The full list of agreements reached at COP-16 can be read <a href="http://unfccc.int/2860.php ">here</a>.

COP-16: Modest Trade Union Successes Inside Big Picture

<img alt="" src="" width="100" height="39" />
Roquette Fr&egrave;res is a family-controlled transnational based in Lestrem, France, that in September 2009 signed the ten principles of the UN Global Compact. One year later, the company submitted over 70 regressive contract proposals to the US union, Local 48-G of the Bakery, Confectionery, Tobacco, and Grain Millers (BCTGM) Union at a corn wet milling plant in Keokuk, Iowa. 
 
When union members rejected the drastic cuts to their living and work standards on 28 September 2010, Roquette America locked its 240-member workforce in Keokuk off their jobs. 
 
That move has now produced an official protest to George Kell, head of the Global Compact. The recommendation to de-list Roquette from the voluntary body comes from the International Union of Food, Agricultural Workers' Association (IUF), the BCTGM&rsquo;s Global Union Federation, the ICEM, and the American labour centre, AFL-CIO. 
<img alt="" src="" width="328" height="89" />
&ldquo;We believe that Roquette Fr&egrave;res actions undermine the legitimacy of the Global Company,&rdquo; stated IUF General Secretary Ron Oswald, ICEM General Secretary Manfred Warda, and AFL-CIO President Richard Trumka in a 3 December letter to Kell. &ldquo;The company should not be able to claim that it supports the Global Compact when in reality it is systematically violating fundamental human rights.&rdquo; 
 
(The entire letter can be viewed <a href="/wp-content/migration/icem/1012.Roquette.global%20compact%20letter$.pdf ">here</a>.) 
The company&rsquo;s collective bargaining agenda in a proposed four-year renewal agreement is especially egregious. It seeks unlimited rights to employ temporary workers at the corn starch plant in America&rsquo;s heartland; it wants a two-tier wage scheme in which new hires will receive 47% less than other workers; it desires big increases in worker co-payments on their health care; an end to the company&rsquo;s defined benefit pension scheme, to be replaced by a pension savings plan; elimination of sick leave, maternity leave, and personal days; and Roquette America is seeking an end to workplace seniority on layoffs and job bidding. 
<img alt="" src="" width="116" height="210" />
The company also wants a wage freeze for the four years. 
 
A week into the lockout, Roquette hired scab workers to run the plant. It has brought in management personnel from a plant it owns in Gurnee, Illinois, and is using replacement workers from temporary labour agencies and an enterprise in the state of Ohio that specializes in providing contingency workers when staff of a company strike or are locked out. 
 
In a further rebuke to the principles of the Global Compact, earlier this year Roquette&rsquo;s Keokuk plant was hit with a US$1 million fine as a civil penalty regarding air pollution violations. The penalty was part of a consent order by a local district court judge in agreement with the state of Iowa and Roquette, in which the company admitted wrongdoing.
(The IUF's campaign on Roquette can be viewed <a href="http://www.iuf.org/cgi-bin/campaigns/show_campaign.cgi?c=539">here</a>.)&nbsp; 
 
Roquette Fr&egrave;res operates in 12 countries and manufactures different corn starches in Keokuk, including starch derivatives and polyols, or sugar alcohols, from the corn wet milling process for use in food and pharmaceutical grade dextrose, corn syrup, and other products.

ICEM Joins IUF in Global Compact Protest of French Firm’s US Lockout

<img alt="" src="" width="110" height="50" />
The ICEM has developed a short guide to dealing with Contract and Agency Labour (CAL). The guide, intended to help unions raise awareness of the prevalence and impact of precarious work, outlines what types of employment are included in the ICEM&rsquo;s definition of CAL, and highlights some of the most common problems associated with such work. 
 
The guide also gives an overview of what the ICEM and its affiliates around the world are doing to promote permanent, direct employment, and at the same time to promote better conditions for CAL workers. 
 
The guide lists a number of specific attempts unions have made to keep employment permanent and direct, for example, by agreeing to a cap on the number of CAL workers who can be employed in a particular company or sector, or by restricting the number of times a fixed-term contract may be renewed before employment becomes permanent. 
 
In terms of ensuring respect for the rights of CAL workers, ICEM affiliates have sought guarantees that CAL workers will receive equal treatment from the first day of their employment and that those on fixed-term contracts will receive severance fees in the event their contracts are not renewed. Unions have also attempted, and in some cases succeeded, in negotiating collective bargaining agreement clauses, which require the company to consult with the union, and to get their approval, before outside labour is used. 
 
The guide proposes ways in which unions can build relations with CAL workers, suggesting that unions consider altering their internal rules to permit CAL workers to join; create a dedicated precarious workers&rsquo; section or representative; or consider introducing different membership fee levels and alternative methods of dues collection. 
 
The guide concludes by encouraging affiliates to initiate a discussion on CAL within their own unions, and suggests a number of questions which may help to get these discussions started. 
 
The ICEM&rsquo;s Mini Guide to Dealing with CAL is available <a href="/wp-content/migration/icem/1012.ICEM%20Mini%20Guide%20CAL%20HQ.pdf">here</a>.

ICEM Launches Mini Guide to Dealing with Contract, Agency Labour

<img src="" width="100" height="39" alt="" />
ICEM ve Uluslararası Metal İş&ccedil;ileri Federasyonu (IMF), ekonomik, &ccedil;evresel ve sosyal krizler arasındaki ilişkileri ele alan, &ldquo;Emisyonu Azaltmak &ndash; İstihdamı D&ouml;n&uuml;şt&uuml;rmek&rdquo; konulu ortak bir panel d&uuml;zenledi. 7 Aralık'taki panel, COP16 &ccedil;er&ccedil;evesinde, &ldquo;Emek D&uuml;nyası&rdquo; genel başlığı altında, Meksika'nın Cancun kentindeki Universidad del Sur'da ger&ccedil;ekleşti. 
 
İnsana yakışır ve s&uuml;rd&uuml;r&uuml;lebilir istihdamın korunması ve yaratılması ve iklim değişikliğiyle m&uuml;cadelede sendikaların rol&uuml; konusunda bir&ccedil;ok tanınmış sendikacı g&ouml;r&uuml;şlerini dile getirdi. 
 
IMF Japonya'dan Şoi&ccedil;iro Kaneko, &uuml;lkenin teknolojik ilerlemeden yararlanarak karbon emisyonlarının denetiminde kaydettiği gelişmeyi ve &ouml;nerilen iklim fonuna verilen desteği vurguladı. Ne var ki, Kaneko, yeni anlaşma b&uuml;t&uuml;n b&uuml;y&uuml;k emisyon kaynaklarını kapsamayacak ve uygulanabilir nitelik taşımayacak olursa, karbon sızıntısının s&uuml;rebileceği kaygısını dile getirdi. 
<img alt="" src="" width="233" height="166" />
Soldan sağa: ICEM'den Brian Kohler, CFMEU'dan Michael O'Conner, ITUC'tan James Howard, IMF-Japonya'dan Şoi&ccedil;iro Kaneko
Avustralya İnşaat, Orman, Maden ve Enerji Sendikası (CFMEU) Ulusal Sekreteri Michael O'Connor, Tasmanya'da yeni bir k&acirc;ğıt ve k&acirc;ğıt hamuru fabrikasının ekonomik potansiyelini ortaya koymak i&ccedil;in &ccedil;evre gruplarıyla kendi sendikasının nasıl bir &ccedil;alışma ilişkisi kurduğunu anlattı. 
 
O'Connor burada dikkat edilecek noktanın, sendikanın iş&ccedil;ileri temsil ettiğini hatırlamak ve iş&ccedil;ilerin sesinin duyulmasını sağlamak olduğunu s&ouml;yledi. 
 
Uluslararası Sendikalar Konfederasyonu'ndan (ITUC) James Howard, ITUC'un Adil Ge&ccedil;iş politikası konusunu ele aldı. Adil Ge&ccedil;iş hi&ccedil; de basit bir s&uuml;re&ccedil; değildir; ancak araştırma, diyalog, sendika-işveren anlaşmaları, g&uuml;&ccedil;l&uuml; sosyal programlar, sanayi yatırımları ve iş&ccedil;ilerin eğitimiyle ger&ccedil;ekleşecektir. 
 
Ana konuşmacı, Japonya'nın Ekonomi, Ticaret ve Sanayi Bakanlığı'ndan İzura Kobayaşi idi. Kobayaşi devam eden iklim g&ouml;r&uuml;şmelerini a&ccedil;ık s&ouml;zl&uuml; bir tavırla &ouml;zetledi.
<img alt="" src="" width="220" height="128" />
İzura Kobayaşi ve Michael O'Connor
İzura Kobayaşi, Japonya'nın g&ouml;r&uuml;ş&uuml;n&uuml; (ki Japonya, Kyoto s&uuml;recinin karbon sızıntısını &ouml;nleme konusunda yeterli &uuml;lke desteğine sahip olmadığı g&ouml;r&uuml;ş&uuml;nde) a&ccedil;ıklamasının yanı sıra, &ouml;nemli bir&ccedil;ok &uuml;st d&uuml;zey g&ouml;r&uuml;şme ve &ouml;zel &ccedil;alışma gruplarının &ccedil;alışmaları hakkında bilgi de verdi. 
 
Nihai sonucu tahmin etmek zor, ama bazı &ouml;nemli konularda ilerleme kaydedildi. Japonya, elbette, imalat sanayilerinde verimli enerji kullanmasının ve yeni teknolojilere yatırım yapmasının ilerlemeyi sağlayan ana y&ouml;ntemlerden biri olduğu g&ouml;r&uuml;ş&uuml;nde. 
 
ICEM'den Brian Kohler ve IMF'den Kan Matusuzaki her iki k&uuml;resel federasyonun politikalarını ve Uluslararası Tekstil ve Deri İş&ccedil;ileri Federasyonu'yla (ITGLWF) birlikte Haziran'da d&uuml;zenlenen S&uuml;rd&uuml;r&uuml;lebilirlik &Uuml;zerine D&uuml;nya Konferansı'nın sonu&ccedil;larını a&ccedil;ıkladılar. Ayrıca, &ldquo;Değişimi &Ouml;ng&ouml;rmek&rdquo; konusunda bir sunum yaptılar. 
 
ICEM ile IMF'nin Emek D&uuml;nyası adlı etkinliğine katılım iyiydi ve panel son derece olumlu tepkiler aldı.

İklim Konferansı&#039;ndaki ICEM-IMF Forumunda Sanayiye Yaklaşım Tartışıldı

<img alt="" src="" width="100" height="39" />
In the 19 days since 29 miners were pronounced dead in New Zealand&rsquo;s worst mine disaster in 114 years, recovery of the remains of those that perished is still far off, and Pike River Coal Ltd. has given redundancy notices to 90 full-time workers. 
 
That happened on 8 December. 
 
Pike River has already severed its relationship with 70 contract workers at the coking coal mine near Atarua on the west coast of the South Island. 
 
Meanwhile, police and Labour Ministry interviews of Pike River workers over mine safety became contentious when the company insisted on having its lawyers sit in on the interviews. The Engineering, Printing, and Manufacturing Union (EPMU) objected to that, saying it might inhibit the investigation into criminal liability. 
 
&ldquo;We have objected &ndash; it&rsquo;s a clear conflict of interest,&rdquo; said EPMU National Secretary Andrew Little. &ldquo;Police are looking for criminal liability among workers or management &ndash; or both. It&rsquo;s improper for the company to be represented by lawyers in those interviews.&rdquo; 
<img alt="" src="" width="130" height="124" />
EPMU National Secretary Andrew Little
Pike River issued the mandatory four-week layoff notices to its permanent staff last week, meaning that 90 miners will not get paid beyond mid-January. Pike River Coal Ltd. has already launched a commercial feasibility study assessing whether or not it will continue mining the rich Brunner coal seam, but investors say it will take NZ$200 million to re-start the mine. 
 
But it&rsquo;s estimated that it could still take several weeks &ndash; or months &ndash; before the remains of the dead miners are recovered. A local coroner has visited relatives of the deceased to get DNA samples, indicating the difficulty that lies ahead to identify the 29. 
 
The initial 19 November methane gas blast at the Paparoa Range mine most likely killed all 29 miners. Following a subsequent explosion on 24 November, the miners were declared dead. In the days that followed, two further explosions occurred, with coal-stoked fires raging deep in the horizontal shafts of the mine until the middle of last week. 
 
On 29 November, New Zealand Prime Minister John Key announced formation of a three-member Royal Commission of Inquiry to determine causes of the tragedy. That Commission, headed by High Court Justice Graham Panckhurst, with two international mine safety experts on it, will be given broad latitude and it could take up to two years to assemble findings. In the meantime, area police, the Labour Ministry, and the EPMU will conduct separate investigations. 
<img alt="" src="" width="250" height="157" />
NZ Congress of Trade Unions President Helen Kelly with Ian Murray and Tim Whyte, CFMEU Australia at the&nbsp;2 December Memorial Service
Police ended supervision of the mine-site last week and turned recovery procedures back to the company. A Polish-designed G&oacute;rbniczy Agregat Gaśniczy (GAG) jet engine inertisation unit was brought in from the Queensland, Australia, Mine Rescue Unit and on 2 December began to suppress the fires and neutralize combustible gases with inert gases, such as nitrogen. 
 
While this continued over this weekend, a metal cap was placed over the main shaft to allow back pressure in the mine and to further inert deadly gases inside the mine. Early speculation to the cause of the initial explosion was a power outage to a ventilation fan that was some 100 metres into the mine. Methane quickly built-up, followed by a massive explosion. 
 
When an electrician went inside to check the outage during the fateful afternoon of 19 November, the explosion deeper in the mine blew him off his feet. He did manage to rescue an equipment operator who was thrown from a machine, and the two escaped 108 metres up a ladder in a ventilation shaft. Whether or not the giant ventilation fan had been topside, making it easier to re-start, will surely be one of the many issues in upcoming investigations, including the Royal Commission Inquiry. 
 
Several disaster relief funds have been established, and the ICEM is recommending donation be sent to EPMU&rsquo;s &ldquo;Pike River Miners&rsquo; Family Support Trust.&rdquo; The ICEM&rsquo;s New Zealand affiliate said half of everything contributed will go to the Grey District Labour Council community fund, with the other half used to establish a dedicated fund for the education of the children of those miners killed. 
 
Bank transfers can be made to Kiwibank in New Zealand. Account number 38-9011-0165987-00, with checks written to: EPMU Pike River Miners&rsquo; Family Support Trust, c/o PO Box 14-277, Kilbirnie, Wellington, NZ 6241. 
 
Several labour organisations across the globe have already contributed, including A$100,000 by the Australian Construction, Forestry, Mining, and Construction Union (CFMEU) and C$10,000 by the Canadian Auto Workers (CAW) Union.

Pike River Aftermath: Layoffs, Lawyers and Long Investigations

<img src="" width="100" height="39" alt="" />
The Building and Wood Workers&rsquo; International (BWI) has launched an international campaign calling on the Swedish furniture multi-national IKEA and its wholly-owned Swedwood subsidiary to uphold commitments on trade union and worker rights throughout its supply chain. The campaign comes in response to Swedwood and its appalling labour practices at a US factory in Danville, Virginia. 
 
Swedwood is the primary wood manufacturer for IKEA. 
 
In behaviour which has brought comparisons to Walmart, local management in Danville has blocked trade unions access to its 275 factory workers since commencing operations at the site in 2006. The Virginia Occupational Safety and Health Administration in October found Swedwood guilty of numerous unsafe work practices and improper record keeping, hiding the true numbers of serious accidents of workers. 
<img src="" width="130" height="130" alt="" />
Other abuses occurring at Swedwood in the US factory include forced overtime without advance notice, workers forced to work 30 days consecutively, managers manipulating work schedules to cut overtime, workers not allowed bathroom breaks, and most importantly, workers denied their right to trade union representation, and forced to work in an unsafe environment. 
 
BWI has always regarded dialogue in its Global Framework Agreement with IKEA as a model. In that agreement, BWI&rsquo;s first ever, IKEA clearly commits to follow the ILO core labour standards throughout its global operations. Since signing the agreement in 1998, those commitments have been respected in Poland, Russia, and elsewhere, and the Gene3va-based Global Union Federation (GUF) insists that local managers in Danville must be forced to open its doors to the BWI North American affiliate, the International Association of Machinists (IAM). 
 
BWI took the campaign to an IKEA outlet in Vernier, Geneva, on 7 December. Trade union leaders from over 25 countries conducted the protest and sent a clear message to IKEA that they were united against workers&rsquo; rights abuses in Danville, USA. See video footage of the campaign <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dxrfPUe-2Kc">here</a>. 
 
The GUF is calling on supporters to send a Christmas card to IKEA CEO Mikael Ohlsson, demanding an end to labour rights abuses in Danville. The card states that IKEA&rsquo;s customers should be assured &ldquo;that the furnishing products they buy from your stores have been made by workers whose human rights are fully respected.&rdquo; Click <a href="http://www.goiam.org/ikea/">here</a> to send your Christmas message to IKEA.

BWI Launces Holiday Campaign Against IKEA’s Swedwood on Abusing Trade Union Rights

<img alt="" src="" width="100" height="39" />
By a vote of 521 to 398 on 6 December, members of Sindicato de los Trabajadores de Collahuasi voted to end a 32-day strike against the world&rsquo;s third largest copper miner, located in Chile. The Union of Workers of the Collahuasi Copper Mine and Do&ntilde;a Ines de Collahuasi, owned jointly through 44% stakes each by AngloAmerican and Xstrata, resumed talks on 29 November with help from Roman Catholic Prelate Marco Antonio &Oacute;rdenes, Bishop of Iquique. 
 
The union's Second Director, Carlos Daniel Rojas, told the ICEM that Bishop &Oacute;rdenes succeeded &quot;in opening the door&quot; with the company when there appeared little hope that talks would resume, and the union took it from there to work out a settlement. 
 
The final resolve came in negotiations on 5-6 December, with an acceptable compromise. 
 
The vote during the evening of 6 December ended the longest private-sector Chilean copper strike, surpassing one of 26 days in 2006 at the Escondida mine, owned 57.5% by BHP Billiton and 30% by Rio Tinto. 
<img alt="" src="" width="190" height="142" />
Members of the Union Vote to Ratify 42-month Contract on Monday, 6 December
Terms of the settlement will give the 1,551 miners of Collahuasi a wage increase of 16.3% over a 42-month period, and a bonus payment of 12 million pesos (US$25,160). Other key issues in the strike, which began on 5 November, were company-paid health care and education costs for miners&rsquo; children. The union did make significant advances in both these areas from prior levels paid by the company. 
 
The Collahuasi Miners&rsquo; Union also won bonuses for work performed on national holidays, even more of a bonus on Christmas, a 40,000-peso-per-month improvement in the housing allowance, a 400,000-peso housing loan, and dependent scholarship awards for both primary school and university education. 
 
Union President Manuel Mu&ntilde;oz said the contract&rsquo;s outcome would increase monthly benefits by 120,000 pesos, or US$252 per month. 
 
The strike was marked by a united workforce led by Mu&ntilde;oz and Second Director Rojas. The miners of Collahuasi took up residency in the Santa Mar&iacute;a School in Iquique, and staged peaceful and near-daily manifestations in that city. Those demonstrations were strategic in order to draw attention to their cause of gaining adequate health coverage and educational stipends from an employer that posted net profits in 2009 of US$1.56 billion due to high copper pricing. 
 
The 6 December vote took place inside the Santa Mar&iacute;a School. Collahuasi miners returned to return to work high in the Atacama desert of Chile&rsquo;s northern Region I, some 285 kilometres from the port city of Iquique, during the evening of 7 December. 
 
&quot;The Collahuasi miners and their families showed strength and fortitude in a dignified and peaceful way against an enterprise intent on maintaining production and turning profits,&quot; said ICEM General Secretary Manfred Warda. &quot;For that, they have earned the pride and admiration of the world's mining unions.&quot; 
 
ICEM coverage of this heroic strike throughout November can be found <a href="/en/78-ICEM-InBrief/4117-Chile’s-Collahuasi-Copper-Strike-Now-in-Crucial-Stage">here</a> and <a href="/en/78-ICEM-InBrief/4102-Miners-Dig-In-at-Chile’s-Collahuasi-Copper-Strike">here</a>.

ICEM Applauds Resolve of Collahuasi Miners in Chile at Strike’s End

<img alt="" src="" width="120" height="59" />
The ICEM and the International Metalworkers' Federation (IMF) jointly held a discussion panel entitled &ldquo;Cutting Emissions - Transforming Jobs,&quot; exploring the links between the economic, environmental, and social crises. The 7 December panel was part of a trade union-sponsored side event at COP16 and was held at the Universidad del Sur in Canc&uacute;n, Mexico, under the general banner &quot;World of Work.&quot; 
 
Several high-profile trade unionists gave their perspectives on how to preserve and create decent, sustainable jobs, and the role of trade unions in fighting climate change. 
 
Shoichiro Kaneko, IMF-JC/JBU of Japan, emphasized the progress that nation has made in controlling carbon emissions through technological advances, and the support offered to the proposed climate fund. However, he expressed concern about the potential for carbon leakage if a new accord does not include all the major emitters and is not enforceable. 
<img src="" width="233" height="166" alt="" />
Left to right: ICEM's Brian Kohler, CFMEU's Michael O'Conner, ITUC's James Howard, IMF-JC/JBU's&nbsp;Shoichiro Kaneko
Michael O'Connor, National Secretary-elect of Australia&rsquo;s Construction, Forestry, Mining, and Energy Union (CFMEU) told of how his union had forged a working relationship with environmental groups to unlock the economic potential for a new pulp and paper mill in Tasmania.
He said the key was to remember that a trade union represents workers, and to ensure that their voice is heard. 
 
James Howard of the International Trade Union Confederation (ITUC) elaborated on ITUC's policy of Just Transition. Far from simple, a Just Transition will only be achieved through research, dialogue, union-employer agreements, strong social programmes, investments in industry, and training and education of workers. 
 
The keynote speaker was Izura Kobayashi of Japan's Ministry of Economy, Trade, and Industry (METI), part of the Japanese official negotiating team in Canc&uacute;n. He presented a very frank resume of the ongoing climate talks. 
<img src="" width="276" height="160" alt="" />
Izura Kobayashi of Japan's Ministry of Economy, Trade, and Industry, and CFMEU's Michael O'Connor
Besides explaining Japan's position (Japan believes that the Kyoto process does not have sufficient country support to prevent carbon leakage) he also explained the status of many of the important main track and subsidiary body discussions. As of 7 December, the unusual situation has evolved of the high-level talks commencing while the ad-hoc working groups have not completed their tasks. 
 
What this means for the final outcome is difficult to guess, but progress has been made on some important issues. Japan, of course, believes that efficient energy use in its manufacturing industries and investment in new technologies is one of the key paths forward. 
 
Brian Kohler of the ICEM and Kan Matusuzaki of IMF presented ICEM and IMF policies, the outcomes of the World Conference on Sustainability held in June along with the International Textile, Garment, and Leather Workers' Federation (ITGLWF), and a discussion paper on &quot;Anticipating Change&quot; that examines how the proposed climate fund could be a starting point for discussions on industrial policies and worker participation in such areas as training. 
 
The ICEM-IMF World of Work event was well attended, and feedback following the event was extremely positive.

ICEM, IMF Forum at Climate Conference Presents Industrial Perspectives

<img src="" width="100" height="39" alt="" />
The coal-mining dispute in Australia between the Construction, Forestry, Mining, and Energy Union (CFMEU) and Peabody Energy at the North Goonyella mine intensified when the US-based company used the country&rsquo;s new Fair Work law to lock 280 miners from their jobs in central Queensland. Just as CFMEU was to ratchet up industrial actions in protest to a radical Peabody overhaul to an enterprise labour agreement, the company imposed a 10-day, unpaid lockout on 9 December. 
 
The very next day, some 20 CFMEU miners from Mackay, Queensland, flew to Brisbane where they were joined by 100 others in a protest at Peabody&rsquo;s Australian offices. The Brisbane protest happened while police and private security 800 kilometres away in Mackay erected barricades at mine gates, expecting the protest there. 
 
The dispute started in early November (see InBrief No. 144 article <a href="/en/78-ICEM-InBrief/3507-CFMEU-Begins-Job-Actions-at-Peabody-Coal-in-Australia">here</a>) when strike actions began following Peabody&rsquo;s intransigence over a CFMEU proposal to again extend the enterprise agreement, while giving a long overdue pay raise. 

<img src="" width="110" height="226" alt="" />
Miners at North Goonyella have been without a pay increase since May 2008. The labour agreement expired in March 2008 and was extended for one year. The two sides then began bargaining toward a new agreement but seven months later Peabody&rsquo;s steep concessionary demands brought forth a formal dispute. 
 
The mining company is seeking a radically changed work shift structure, one that would negatively impact pay grids. CFMEU members are concerned about fatigue and work safety, and also have grievances over living conditions in on-site housing. 
 
A Peabody spokeswoman termed the lockout an employer protective action under the Labour government&rsquo;s Fair Work law, which took effect 1 July 2009. It is one of the first defensive lockouts used by bosses under the Labour government&rsquo;s new law. 
 
At last Thursday&rsquo;s manifestation in Brisbane, CFMEU District Vice President Glenn Power said, &ldquo;We are here to protest and send a clear message to Peabody that their corporate greed and bullish attitude around the negotiating table needs to be reconsidered.&rdquo; 
 
The two sides were to meet today, 16 December, for further talks. Peabody mines coking coal from the underground mine at North Goonyella that is exported from Dalrymple Bay, Queensland, and used in steel-making. The mine and the adjacent open-cast Eaglefield mine produce three million short tons of coal per annum. Peabody bought the mines from Germany-based RAG AG in 2003.

Peabody Locks Out CFMEU Coal Miners in Australia

<img height="39" alt="" src="" width="100" />
The ICEM has participated at events each day of the Conference of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, and will continue to do so. 
 
Find below a brief report from each day. 
 
6 December: COP15 is the 15th Conference of the Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. As many as 400 trade union representatives from around the world will be here in Copenhagen to make the case for working people. COP15 is considered to be a particularly important Conference of the Parties, since the Kyoto Protocol expires in 2012, and COP15 is supposed to be the Conference at which a successor to the Kyoto Protocol is agreed upon, or at least substantially mapped out. There is a sense of urgency since the most recent assessment of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) is bleak. The world must act quickly. 

<img height="167" alt="" src="" width="171" />
The earth is a high-tech animated, illuminated model of the earth at the USA pavillion that can display multiple climate variables
The ICEM says that we need a fair, ambitious and binding agreement on greenhouse gas emissions to deal with the problem of climate change. However, an agreement that fails to include a strategy for job creation, job protection, and a Just Transition plan, will fail to create a sustainable future. It cannot be jobs versus the environment. It must be both, or it will ultimately be neither. 
 
7 December: COP-15 officially opened today, with the expected chaos at the registration tables as tens of thousands of official negotiators, observers, and press tried to obtain the badges that would allow them to pass through the tight security. 
 
At the first plenary session on &quot;Longterm Cooperative Action&quot;, there were no surprises as both rich, developed nations and poorer, developing nations staked out their initial positions. 
 
One thing is certain: when the bill for environmental collapse comes due, it is ordinary people - workers, their families, and the communities that depend on them - that will pay the price. Another path is possible, a path that seeks prosperity and sustainability through the transformation of existing jobs and the creation of a greener economy. Do we have the wisdom to choose it? 
 
8 December: The big news of today was a &quot;leaked&quot; draft final agreement that allegedly was produced by the Danish Prime Minister's office in consultation with other countries. Presumably, it is meant to be a fall-back agreement should the two weeks of COP15 fail to reach a substantive agreement. As such, it proposes no firm greenhouse gas emissions targets, no defined levels of financial assistance for developing countries, and is stripped of all references to social impacts including sustainable jobs or Just Transition. Most alarmingly, it raises the possibility that years of work leading up to this conference may be by-passed in the last minute, simply to have something signed at the end. Obviously this is unacceptable. As this story evolved, it emerged that there are several alternate texts being prepared or circulated outside of the &quot;official&quot; process. 

<img height="169" alt="" src="" width="225" />
Michael Cutajar,&nbsp;the chair of the &quot;Ad-Hoc Working Group on Long-term Cooperative Action&quot;
9 December:&nbsp;a Wednesday, 9 December, meeting.&nbsp;The&nbsp; Ad-hoc Working Group on Longterm Cooperative Action released a new version of its &quot;Shared Vision&quot; paper, and a key demand of labour - a paragraph on Just Transition - is retained, so far. In the plenary meetings, much of the discussion was about financing, with several proposals to fold funding for climate mitigation and adaptation into overall aid funds, and allow it to be managed by &quot;international financial institutions&quot; such as the World Bank. Costa Rica and Tuvalu proposed fairly strong emissions reduction targets for both developed, and developing countries. This has at least temporarily split the G77 group of countries, as a number of members of that group were opposed to the proposal. 
 
10 December: 10&nbsp;December was a day of many closed-door meetings and rumours. On labour's key paragraph (in the &quot;Shared Vision&quot; document of the working group on Longterm Cooperative Action) covering decent work and Just Transition, there was support from Argentina, the EU, and the US, but the paragraph is still vulnerable to hostile amendments or outright deletion. This is the wording so far:
&nbsp; 
&quot;Realizing that harmonizing sustainable development while addressing climate change and demands for a more equitable utilization of the global atmospheric resource necessitate a paradigm shift that adjusts global economic growth patterns towards a [low-emission] [high-growth] sustainable climate-resilient development, based on innovative technologies and more sustainable production and consumption, while ensuring a just transition of the workforce which creates decent work and quality jobs, and seeking the active participation of all stakeholders be they governmental, including subnational and local government, private business or civil society, including the youth, and addressing the need for gender equity.&quot; 

<img height="130" alt="" src="" width="200" />
The &quot;Fossil of the Day&quot; is awarded by environmental groups to the country or countries that have been the worst behaved that day in their opinion
11 December: At today's plenary meeting of the Adhoc Working Group on Longterm Cooperative Action, &quot;labour's paragraph&quot; (discussed in yesterday's dispatch) survived - at least in concept - and will likely be retained in the final report of the &quot;Shared Vision&quot;! As several amendments were proposed labour must be cautious in our celebration until a final version of the paragraph emerges. However, this is an important milestone, and testimony to the effectiveness of many months of preparatory work and a week of lobbying here at COP15. We must now get to work to make sure the final version contains acceptable wording, and that politicians talk about it when the Copenhagen outcomes are announced. 
 
In other fora, debate continued between developed and developing countries over targets and financing. 
ITUC Copenhagen Reports <a href="http://climate.ituc-csi.org/2009-ituc-statement-on-climate.html?lang=fr">here</a>.

ICEM: First Week Diary and Commentary at Copenhagen

Archive

COP-16: Modest Trade Union Successes Inside Big Picture

ICEM Joins IUF in Global Compact Protest of French Firm’s US Lockout

ICEM Launches Mini Guide to Dealing with Contract, Agency Labour

İklim Konferansı'ndaki ICEM-IMF Forumunda Sanayiye Yaklaşım Tartışıldı

Pike River Aftermath: Layoffs, Lawyers and Long Investigations

BWI Launces Holiday Campaign Against IKEA’s Swedwood on Abusing Trade Union Rights

ICEM Applauds Resolve of Collahuasi Miners in Chile at Strike’s End

ICEM, IMF Forum at Climate Conference Presents Industrial Perspectives

Peabody Locks Out CFMEU Coal Miners in Australia

ICEM: First Week Diary and Commentary at Copenhagen

About IndustriALL

Follow us

Contact us