English

Español

Français

Aerospace

Automotive

Base metals

Chemical, pharmaceutical and bio-science

Energy

Glass, cement, ceramic and associated industries

ICT, electrical and electronics

Mechanical Engineering

Mining and DGOJP

Pulp and paper

Rubber

Shipbuilding and shipbreaking

Textile, garment, shoes, leather and textile services

Sectors

Action on textile and garment industry

Clean up shipbreaking

Ratify ILO C176

United for a just future - time to pay up!

Disinvest from Myanmar

Action Plan 2021-2025

Global Framework Agreements

Union building

Women

Youth

White-collar workers

Health & safety

Industry 4.0

Just Transition

Organizing with industriALL

What we do

Affiliates

Statutes

Elected Officials

Executive Committee

Geneva head office

South East Asia

Eastern Europe, Central Asia and the Caucasus

Latin America and the Caribbean

Middle East and North Africa

South Asia

Regional offices

About us

Global worker No1 2022

Global worker No2 2022

Publications

Resources

Press

TURKEY: Birleşik Metal-Is members at Bosal Mimaysan who fought hard for union representation two years ago are again facing attacks by local management who are pressuring workers to resign from their union and join the company-supported union, Turk Metal.Birleşik Metal-Is , an affiliate of the International Metalworkers&#039; Federation, reports that for the past three months local management at the plant has harassed and coerced workers to leave Birleşik Metal-Is and join Turk Metal. In January, Birleşik Metal-Is members occupied facilities in protest of this harassment and in defence of their fundamental rights including representation by the union of their choice. Discussions between Birleşik Metal-Is and Bosal Group Human Resources in Istanbul on March 22 failed to bring a resolution to these violations.In recent days, Turk Metal buses have been stationed outside the plant in an effort to further intimidate workers. Under Turkish law, unions must seek authorisation every two years. It is clear that local management is using intimidation tactics to undermine the re-authorisation of Birleşik Metal-Is, which will take place on April 5. &quot;Local management&#039;s actions are in direct violation of a worker&#039;s right to freedom of association guaranteed by Turkish law and the International Labour Organisation&#039;s Convention 87 ratified by Turkey,&quot; said Marcello Malentacchi, IMF general secretary in a letter to Bosal management. &quot;As a signatory of the UN Global Compact, your company is committed to ensuring that the workers in its plants have the right to be represented by the union of their choice free from threats and retribution.&quot;Bosal Mimaysan, an auto parts producer,  is a supplier to major automotive companies. Many of these companies are signatories of agreements with the IMF that commit them to fully respect worker and trade union rights and to ensure decent terms and safe conditions of work in their own operations and those of their suppliers.The IMF is asking affiliates to send letters of solidarity to Birleşik Metal-Is and to voice their concern to Bosal management.To send letters to Birleşik Metal-Is:<ul><li>Please email: <a href="mailto:gaye@birlesikmetal.org">gaye@birlesikmetal.org</a></li></ul>To send letters to Bosal management:<ul><li>Please email Michel Geerts, Bosal Group Human Resources: <a href="mailto:michel.geerts@eur.bosal.com">michel.geerts@eur.bosal.com</a></li><li>Please email Bosal Mimaysan A.S.: <a href="mailto:bmt@eur.bosal.com">bmt@eur.bosal.com</a></li></ul>Please keep the IMF informed of all actions taken on behalf of Bosal Mimaysan workers, send copies of letters to: <a href="mailto:info@imfmetal.org">info@imfmetal.org</a>

Bosal workers pressured to join company-supported union.

IMF letter to Bosal management

Rights abuses at Turkish auto parts company

ROMANIA: Some 10,000 workers at Romanian automaker Dacia, the country's largest carmaker owned by Renault, went on strike on March 24 for a 50 per cent increase in wages and improved benefits and conditions. The strike follows a March 14 walkout, when 4,000 workers downed tools in a two hour protest.Management has attempted to intimidate workers by threatening to move production to other countries. The company has challenged the legality of the strike and a court said it would deliver a ruling on April 2.The average gross monthly salary at Dacia-Renault is about 1,064 lei (US$446), however some 2,500 workers with no seniority rights are paid much less, at a monthly rate of 780 lei (US$327). Workers are demanding raises of 550 lei (US$231) per month for all employees.Other worker demands include participation in profit sharing, improved Easter and Christmas bonuses, equal rights for workers, a reduction and limit on use of fixed-term contracts, and a vehicle discount for purchases of Logan Dacia, Renault and Nissan cars.Dacia-Renault reported record sales in 2007 of 230,000 vehicles sold in Romania and abroad, up 17.4 per cent from the previous year.

Workers at Renault-owned Dacia are striking for improved wages and benefits.

Strike at Cerro Matoso ends

Romanian autoworkers on strike

URUGUAY: As all IMF affiliates are aware, the IMF Regional Office for Latin America and the Caribbean has been moved from Santiago in Chile to Montevideo, Uruguay. The office opened on Monday 31 March 2008.Do not hesitate to contact the office for any information you require. The address is:  Avenida 18 de Julio Nº 1528 Piso 12 unidad 1202. Montevideo. The phone and fax number is: +59-82-4080813. To contact the office by email, write to <a href="mailto:fitimalc@adinet.com.uy">fitimalc@adinet.com.uy</a>  or to Jorge Almeida at <a href="mailto:jalmeida-fitim@adinet.com.uy">jalmeida-fitim@adinet.com.uy</a>, or Ana María Perez at <a href="mailto:amperez-fitim@adinet.com.uy">amperez-fitim@adinet.com.uy</a>The Regional Office would like to thank Latin American and Caribbean affiliates for their cooperation in this period of change.

The IMF Regional Office for Latin America and the Caribbean has moved to Montevideo and opened on Monday 31 March.

Uruguay is the new location of the IMF Regional Office

Statement from the Renault Group Works Council

<a href="index.cfm?n=67&amp;l=2"><img id="40_2" src="" border="0" alt="Metal World 1-2009" width="87" height="110" /></a><a class="imagetext" href="index.cfm?n=67&amp;l=2"> Metal World: Our quarterly magazine.</a>

Metal World (Banner, ENG)

Follow the link to read get access to <a href="../index.cfm?n=634">an on-line version of the magazine</a>.

The quartely magazine of the International Metalworkers' Federation

Metal World

USA:  United Auto Workers (UAW) members at five American Axle Manufacturing locations in Michigan and New York voted on May 22 to ratify a new four-year labour agreement by a 78 per cent margin, ending a three-month strike. The agreement covers 3,650 workers.According to press reports, the agreement involves buyouts with reduced wages, a freeze of the pension plan and the closure of three plants, resulting in about US$300 million in annual structural cost reductions.&quot;Our members have had to make some tough decisions for themselves and their families,&quot; said UAW President Ron Gettlefinger.The agreement was reached at a time of falling sales of pickup trucks and SUVs. Nevertheless, American Axle's CEO Richard Dauch received US$10.2 million last year in compensation.American Axle is a Detroit-based auto parts supplier created in 1994 when General Motors spun off five U.S. plants. Last year the parts supplier posted a US$37 million profit.

UAW members vote to ratify a new four-year agreement.

UAW strikes American Axle

Strike ends at American Axle

Precarious work is rapidly becoming the biggest obstacle to the respect of workers rights. Every day, more and more workers find themselves in precarious jobs where they have no right even to join a union, let alone to bargain collectively with their employer. Some are formally excluded because basic rights are denied in law. Others have rights on paper, but no rights in fact because laws are not enforced. And others are too afraid to exercise their rights because they could lose their jobs at any minute.We want to see Conventions 87 and 98 applied to all workers, but what we are seeing instead is that whole categories of employment are effectively being excluded from the reach of these conventions.That is why we have come today to bring our message to the International Labour Office, to say that much more needs to be done to recognise how precarious workers are being denied their fundamental labour rights. This understanding must then be spread across all ILO programs to ensure that labour standards are applied to precarious work.The IMF shares the concerns expressed by my colleagues from other GUFs. The IMF is seeing more temporary, more casual, more part-time and more contract jobs than we have ever seen before. Stable employment and good jobs are being eroded at a frightening rate. In fact, what we used to call atypical work is fast becoming typical.Last year we surveyed our affiliates and ninety per cent of the unions that responded said that precarious work in the metal sector had increased during the last five years.They said that employers use precarious work to evade their obligations to provide social security and pensions, maternity and family leave, overtime payments, vacation and holidays, and occupational health and safety. And wages of precarious workers are much less than for permanent workers - in a third of cases reported in our survey, wages were more than 50% less for precarious workers, compared with the permanent workforce.Ninety percent of unions that responded to the survey said that workers in their country feel less secure as a result of changing employment relationships. In an increasing number of workplaces in the metal sector, precarious workers make up more than half the total workforce. The electrical and electronics industry and the automotive industry are currently the most affected, but the other metal sectors are rapidly catching up.Our affiliates also confirmed our understanding that precarious work disproportionately impacts young workers, women workers and migrant workers.Women are especially affected by precarious work. Their jobs tend to be more precarious in general, with less security, lower pay, fewer benefits and weaker social protection than men. The chance to find regular employment further decreases if you are a younger or migrant worker. Women are overrepresented in precarious work throughout the world. Access to full-time permanent jobs for women has always been low but now it is reducing even further.Precarious work makes a large contribution to the pay gap between men and women.  In Japan, women part-time workers earn only 54 per cent of the hourly wage of regular women workers, a gap which has widened in the last decade.  In Korea, 70 per cent of women workers are precariously employed, earning only 43 per cent of the salaries of regular male workers.Some of you may be familiar with the complaint that IMF and our Korean affiliate KMWU took to the Committee on Freedom of Association about anti-union acts against falsely subcontracted workers.  What you may not know is that in the Kiryung Electronics factory, which was cited in the complaint, only 5 per cent of the workers are permanent employees and they are all male.  Nearly all the precarious workers are women earning 47 per cent less than their male colleagues.  There is nothing new about low pay for women and for other groups of workers. But, in the past low-paying, bad jobs at least had the chance of leading to better jobs and better futures. Now, precarious work has cut off that route, ensuring that far too many workers remain on the margins of society no matter how hard or how many years they work. Workers and their families are denied both justice and opportunity.Rest assured - we are not sitting back while all this is happening. Metalworking unions are responding concretely on multiple fronts. They are using collective bargaining to convert precarious jobs to permanent and to guarantee equal pay for similar work. They are helping precarious workers organise themselves into unions and fight for their rights. And they are campaigning for legislative and political change to ensure social security protections and protection against dismissal. But our unions are facing an uphill battle and they need the support of the ILO. The best hope for precarious workers to improve their situation is to unionise. Yet precarious workers the world over are systematically being denied freedom of association. These are some of the comments made by unions responding to the IMF survey:&quot;In the precarious jobs the workers do not have the right to be part of a trade union - they will be dismissed on the spot.&quot;FGME-UGTT, Tunisia&quot;Union structure, which has been defined by legislation, divides trade union representation. An outsourced worker will generally be represented by another non-metalworker trade union with less bargaining capacity.&quot;CNM-CUT, Brazil&quot;New labour legislation prohibits organising precarious workers into trade unions.&quot;BML, Bangladesh&quot;When irregular workers organize a union, the employer fires the unionised workers by ending the contract with the intermediary contractor, and keeps contractors that are non-union. KMWU, South KoreaThe rapid increase in precarious work is of grave concern to IMF affiliates all over the world.  That is why we have embarked on a global campaign to raise awareness of the impact of precarious work on families, communities and even on countries. The campaign is about <ul><li>Stopping the massive expansion of precarious work</li><li>Making the wages and conditions of precarious workers equal to those of regular workers</li><li>Getting workers hired directly by their employers, and</li><li>Restricting non-permanent employment to cases of legitimate need.</li></ul>Already we have seen massive mobilisations. In Jakarta on 14 August, more than ten thousand workers took to the streets to protest the precarious employment practices of Singaporean, Japanese and Korean companies in front of their respective embassies. The President of FSPMI Indonesia said that, &quot;If precarious work is not controlled it will lead to the destruction of unions and exploitation of workers.  We will carry on fighting this issue no matter how long it takes.&quot; The FSPMI is far from the only union for which precarious work threatens the very survival of stable employment and collective bargaining. The IMF campaign has resonated with our affiliates all over the world and is shaping up to be one of the biggest and most significant campaigns in our history. This is an important issue to working people, regardless of the country they come from. Precarious work not only strips workers of basic human rights, but compromises workplace health and safety standards, erodes working conditions and wages, and places an enormous stress on workers and their families. This is of serious concern to the IMF and the international labour movement. We can and must play a role in stopping the assault on good, permanent jobs. The ILO has a long tradition of making and applying standards and is capable of addressing the problems generated by precarious work. With the will, and internal policy coherence, it can keep faith with its constituents and with its mission. We come here to ask you to recognise the damage that the explosion of precarious work is doing to workers, and to any reasonable prospect of building decent societies, and to integrate this into ILO priorities. We have some ideas for your consideration. First, we are calling upon the ILO to research all the different ways that precarious workers are prevented from joining trade unions and bargaining collectively. Our affiliates tell us that government legislation is the biggest obstacle to organizing precarious workers, but we know that there are many other barriers as well. Armed with this information, we want to see the ILO taking action in conjunction with all its constituents to ensure that Conventions 87 and 98 are applied to all workers, including precarious workers.The Declaration on Social Justice for a Fair Globalisation is an important tool for addressing the injustices of precarious work. Globalisation of investment and trade has brought jobs to countries that badly need them. But instead of spreading regular employment more fairly throughout the world, the impact has been to undermine full-time permanent work where it does exist. Transnational companies are increasingly favouring insecure employment, driving down wages and conditions for all workers, and contributing to the growing gap between rich and poor. But insecure employment and reduced wages will not lead us to stable development. That is why we join the Director-General in calling for policy coherence. I probably don't need to remind you of the top employment rating the World Bank's Doing Business report gives to Belarus, a country that has been condemned by this organisation for restricting workers rights, and has forced all its workers into fixed term contracts, effectively abolishing permanent employment. The policies of the IMF and the World Bank must not undermine efforts to create a sustainable and fair globalisation, by weakening labour protection and effectively promoting precarious work. Putting resources into implementing the Social Justice Declaration will go a long way towards confronting the pandemic of precarious work.Another vital tool is the Employment Relationship Recommendation. Many precarious workers find themselves forced into unclear or disguised employment relationships which deprive them of the protection they are due. These can be addressed through more vigorous promotion of the Employment Relationship Recommendation, not forgetting that even where precarious workers are employed directly or on unambiguous contracts, there is a widespread failure to accord them their rights. The employment relationship is the basis for labour law and its protection. As such, it is vital for the respect of ILO standards.In 2009 the ILO will be putting a strong focus on collective bargaining through a meeting of experts, a high-level tripartite meeting and an ACTRAV symposium on collective bargaining. For the union movement, collective bargaining holds the key to both determining the circumstances under which non-permanent or outsourced employment is justified, and ensuring that wages and conditions of precarious workers are equal to those of regular workers.Collective agreements can ensure equal treatment for all workers, whatever their legal status. This is both to protect the precarious workers and to prevent employers from using worse pay and conditions to undermine regular employment. Precariously employed workers, including agency staff, must receive the same pay and benefits as regular employees, so that employers have no incentive to use them as cheap, disposable labour. The best prospect for achieving this is through reaching collective agreements at industry level. But as we know, the vast majority of precarious workers are excluded from collective agreements. The rise of precarious employment has also made it more difficult to identify and bargain with the real decision-makers. Clearly much more needs to be done to tackle precarious work through collective bargaining. For this reason, we believe it is essential that each of the ILO meetings on collective bargaining specifically addresses precarious work. Precarious work undermines collective bargaining, but at the same time collective bargaining can be used to prevent violations of workers' rights through precarious employment.As I have mentioned already, IMF affiliates report that legislation is often the biggest barrier to organising precarious workers. In Bangladesh, like in many other countries, an agency worker is not allowed to join the same union as the directly employed worker next to them.  Improvements can be made to the coverage of labour laws, to extend protection to a wide variety of non-regular workers.Legislation can be used, as it has been in Argentina, to define the responsibility of the principal employer to agency workers. It can be used to legally oblige employers to offer equal conditions of employment to their indirect employees. This is why we want to see the ILO working with governments at country level to revise legislation to make sure that labour standards are applied equally to precarious workers.Our final plea is for national labour inspection to be strengthened. Legislation is not always inadequate - often the problem lies with lack of enforcement. Even when labour laws do offer protection to precarious workers, it is only through effective labour inspection that abusive use of precarious employment can be eliminated.Yes, precarious work is a challenge for workers in trade unions. But it is even more of a threat for workers without unions. Precarious work is not only eroding many hard fought gains, it is slamming the door in the faces of millions of workers and depriving them of any say over their working lives. They are living under a fear which robs them of their rights, their dignity, and their futures. Precarious work is also a challenge for governments. The lack of good labour laws and good enforcement is most keenly felt not by the most privileged, but by those for whom reaching even the bottom rung of the ladder is a daily struggle. Employers are also beginning to learn the price that they are paying for precarious work. Some would welcome a more stable environment, rather than see precarious work make their enterprises precarious too.  Companies want to minimise risk, but simply shifting risk to workers will not guarantee sustainability - in fact, it may make strong growth and steady progress impossible.We are here today to ask the ILO to strongly reaffirm its own mandate, based on an understanding of the growing threat to labour standards that precarious work represents.What happens to the ILO and all that it stands for if labour becomes, once more, a commodity? What does that mean for the one international body that exists to further workers' rights, protections, and social justice? Can the ILO afford to stand on the sidelines rather than look for comprehensive solutions? Is this the kind of work and the kind of lives that any of us want?On behalf of the Global Unions, thank you for your attention. We look forward to a vigorous and productive discussion. &#160;

Speech to GUF/ACTRAV forum at the ILO on "Towards Social Justice: applying labour standards to precarious workers"

Precarious work -- what needs to be done?

SARAJEVO, BOSNIA &amp; HERZEGOVINA:  The IMF started implementation of a two-year occupational health and safety project for its affiliates in the countries of the former Yugoslavia. A planning meeting had been held earlier this year in Belgrade, Serbia to identify the problems and work out a programme that would meet affiliates&#039; needs and help them develop their own capacities.This project targets the steel and non-ferrous sectors and aims at training health and safety shop-stewards and promoting health and safety at the workplace. Generally in this region awareness about health and safety risks is low, accidents are frequent and labour inspection is weak or non-existent. Non-compliance with legal provisions is another major problem that workers and trade unions are confronting continuously.The first phase of the project was carried out in Sarajevo, Bosnia &amp; Herzegovina at the end of September. It focussed on the legislative framework and the relevant European and international instruments concerning occupational health and safety, including international framework agreements (IFAs) which contain provisions in that field. Experts from the International Labour Organisation, the European Trade Union Institute for Research, Education, and Health and Safety, as well as from Spain participated. The next step will deal with risk analysis and prevention techniques. Health and safety material in the local language will also be produced.This project is carried out in cooperation with the IMF Spanish affiliate MCA-UGT and the Trade Union Institute of Cooperation for Development, and with the support of the Spanish Agency for Development Cooperation.

Kick off of the IMF health and safety project in the steel and non-ferrous sectors  in the Balkans.

Improving health and safety in the Balkans

China: The world's leading foreign companies operating in China must unionise by September 30 or face penalties says the country's official trade union body, the All China Federation of Trade Unions (ACFTU).The ACFTU predicts that by the end of the month, 80 per cent of the top 500 global corporations operating in China will have unions. The 200-million strong union body announced the organising directive in June. At that time, less than half of the so-called &quot;Fortune 500&quot; subsidiaries in China had recognised trade unions, compared with more than 73 per cent for all foreign-owned firms in China. The Fortune 500 is a list published annually by Fortune magazine that ranks the top 500 US corporations according to their gross revenue.Most recently IBM and Volvo announced that they would allow workers to organise in their Chinese manufacturing operations. The two join other multinationals such as Wal-Mart, Sony, Canon, FedEx, Intel, and Toyota, many of whom actively oppose and undermine union organising at their operations in other parts of the world.Some see this as another positive step the government has taken to improve conditions for workers. In January 2008 a new labour law addressing the needs of contract workers went into effect limiting the use of temporary labourers and forcing employers to put all work contracts in writing. Sceptics however are concerned that while workers have increasing rights on paper, enforcement of these rights and true representation of workers' interests may still be years away.Unions outside of the ACFTU are illegal and workers who have attempted to organise independent unions have often paid dearly facing two to three year sentences at forced labour camps or heavy jail time, including life imprisonment. While the real gains for workers remains to be seen, one thing is clear- by 2009, China's labour movement will have grown enormously.

The Chinese government sets a September 30 deadline to force "Fortune 500" companies to allow for state-run unions to represent workers.

Archive

About IndustriALL

Follow us

Contact us